![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The question is whether you think those benefits justify the additional traffic-interaction risks. The overview map + multiple cue sheets + discussion + reports here can help with: - - making choices to manage the level and kinds of traffic-interaction risk - - finding a variety of interesting riding and pretty views -- so you might feel like it's worth riding this loop again.
Hills: The main route sections have a total of about 7200 vertical feet of climbing, which is plenty hilly for a route under 100 miles.
Two climbs stand out:
Unpaved or Off-road: There are three unpaved segments on the main route sections:
Two of the Variations offer additional riding on dirt:
Traffic: This route has a substantially larger number of miles with moderate and high volumes of motor vehicle traffic than almost any other route on this website. And there are specific road sections that have greater traffic-interaction risks and require "advanced" traffic-handling skills -- more so than most other road sections in routes on this website.
This route -- and some of its Variations even more so -- has several miles on roads with two lanes in each direction and little or no shoulder that often get substantial vehicle traffic.
more . . .
Our thought is that nobody is going to want to ride all 92 miles of the main route Sections on any single day. Riders will want to skip sections they know well already to focus on exploring sections that are new. Or need to save time as daylight is running out. Or connect with train stations to avoid doing the whole loop. So the cue sheets do not follow a single sequence of miles: Instead the several separate cue sheets each start from 0.0 -- and you select the sheets you find helpful on the day you've chosen to ride.
When we go on a long ride, we usually like lot of variety: quiet roads shaded in the woods, streets in an interesting city with a nice food stop, an off-road path, a big view of the water, long fast cruise on a road with few traffic lights. And that's how we've tried to set up the "main route" for this loop -- but skewed toward quieter roads and more turns than we might normally choose on a ride this long. Many of the Sections of this route offer a choice between an alternate high-traffic road which is shorter -- and the main route which has less traffic but usually more distance, and always more turns. The Summary table of the route Sections compares some of these alternatives. For many of the Sections on the East side, the high-traffic alternate road does not offer much advantage in distance or climbing. The Trip Reports also have some discussion of pros + cons of some of the main route versus high-traffic alternate choices.
For some ideas about riding only parts of this route on the East side, with the assistance of the Metro North trains, see Bicycling in Westchester county. For a route between the GWB and Bear Mt Bridge that makes its loop all on the West side of the river, see NYC to Bear Mountain Adventure.
To focus on the fun downhills around Bear Mountain, see Seven Lakes to the River. To connect with Metro North trains at stations further North on the East side of the Hudson river -- such as Cold Spring and Beacon -- see Bear Mt to Newburgh-Beacon Bridge and Train Stations with Bicycle Routes. To connect with routes and train stations around Manhattan, see Riding from the GWB.
George Washington Bridge: See the NYC to Bear Mt Adventure, the GWB -- Central Park and Manhattan to Nyack routes. Bear Mountain State Park: See the NYC to Bear Mt Adventure and the Bear Mt to Newburgh-Beacon Bridge loop.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||